• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    Procedure for the protection of an object or an ornamental surface of rocky origin, exposed to the elements. The present invention relates to a method of protecting an ornamental object or surface of rocky origin, exposed to the elements; particularly a procedure for the protection of assets of interest to the historical and cultural heritage. It is therefore framed within the materials science sector, and more specifically within coatings for protection against wear and erosion of objects or surfaces of rocky origin. (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)
    公开号:ES2784876A1
    申请号:ES201930277
    申请日:2019-03-26
    公开日:2020-10-01
    发明作者:Dominguez Jose Miguel Gonzalez；Raga Maria Fernandez
    申请人:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas CSIC；Universidad de Leon；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    [0002] Procedure for the protection of an object or an ornamental surface of rocky origin, exposed to the elements
    [0004] The present invention relates to a method for protecting an ornamental object or surface of rocky origin, exposed to the elements, particularly a method for protecting assets of interest to the historical and cultural heritage. It is therefore framed within the materials science sector, and more specifically within coatings for protection against wear and erosion of objects or surfaces of rocky origin.
    [0006] BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
    [0008] The vast majority of archaeological monuments that constitute historical and cultural heritage are exposed to the elements, therefore subject to different environmental conditions that can cause water erosion in their structures. Combating this wear and tear implies constant economic investments by those responsible for its conservation applying treatments frequently, since until now there is no product that offers longer-term protection and that also does not alter the aesthetics and functionality of said heritage.
    [0010] This deterioration is even more evident in carbonate rocks, which are very frequent in monuments but highly vulnerable to erosion. Over the last few years, a wide variety of materials have been tried to protect limestone and dolomites, but all have been unsatisfactory [Moropoulou A, Kouloumbi N, Haralampopoulos G, Konstanti A, Michailidis P (2003) Criteria and methodology for the evaluation of conservation interventions on treated porous stone susceptible to salt decay. Prog. Org. Coat. 48, 259-270]. Recently, coatings with different organic synthetic products such as acrylic or fluorinated polymers have been used, however, these have been discarded because they cause changes in the color of the rock [La Russa MF, Barone G, Belfiore GM, Mazzoleni P, Pezzino A (2011) Application of protective products to 'Noto' calcarenite (south-eastern Sicily): a case study for the conservation of stone materials. Environ. Earth Sci. 62, 1263-1272.] Or have not achieved the necessary effectiveness [Alessandrini G, Aglietto M, Castelvetro V, Ciardelli F, Peruzzi R, Toniolo L (2000) Comparative evaluation of fluorinated and unfluorinated acrylic copolymers as water-repellent coating materials for stone. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
    [0011] 76, 962-977.]. Other protection treatments that have been used are desalinizers, which use paper pulp or absorbent clays impregnated in deionized water to superficially clean the highly damaging salts from the facades [Alemany E, Aranguren L (2003) Criteria for Intervention in Stone Materials. Goods Cult. Inst. Patrim. Historico Esp. 2, 20.], but this alternative has not definitively solved the problem. On occasions, barium chloride or other similar compounds have been used to transform soluble salts into insoluble salts, but these methods are discouraged because they facilitate the formation of secondary products [La Russa MF, Barone G, Belfiore GM, Mazzoleni P , Pezzino A (2011) Application of protective products to 'Noto' calcarenite (south-eastern Sicily): a case study for the conservation of stone materials. Environ. Earth Sci. 62, 1263-1272.].
    [0013] Currently, a large majority of restoration work on ornamental limestone rocks is carried out by applying a series of treatments that include a first cleaning treatment with chemical products, micro-abrasion or laser ablation, subsequent application of hydrophobic and, finally, application of a consolidating product. These treatments, which entail high costs in their application, have a protection period of only five years and do not provide a homogeneous coverage throughout the rock. In addition, they imply a wear of the ornamental rock since it entails small removals of material and superficial abrasion of the stone during its application and, in some cases, chromatic variation.
    [0015] Graphene derivatives, such as graphene oxide, have recently attracted attention in the field of protective coatings for their role in inhibiting corrosion in metals [Nine MJ, Cole MA, Tran DNH, Losic D. Graphene: a multipurpose material for protective coatings. J. Mater. Chem. A, 3, 12580 12602 (2015)], reaching inhibitions of between 94% and 97% in metals such as copper, with different coatings derived from graphene. Graphene has even been shown to have a much greater effect than traditional polymers (used for the same purpose) as a protector against metallic corrosion induced by microorganisms [Krishnamurthy A., Gadhamshetty V., Mukherjee R., Natarajan B., Eksik O., Shojaee SA, Lucca DA, Ren W., Cheng HM, Koratkar N. Superiority of Graphene over Polymer Coatings for Prevention of Microbially Induced Corrosion. Sci. Rep., 5, 1358 (2015).].
    [0016] However, the graphene to which most scientific studies refer is synthesized by vapor deposition, which is an expensive and delicate method, and also requires cumbersome instrumentation, unfeasible for outdoor application or as part of a product / system to make coatings on a large scale (CN106317976A). And in any case, in these works, it would only have been applied to metals, not to stone material.
    [0018] On the other hand, graphene oxide, a much more affordable material that can be easily processed on a larger scale, has been incorporated into commercial paints that contain acrylic polymers; as an additive that enhances their protective effect. (CN106866074A). However, such paintings would alter the aesthetics and functionality of the ornamental assets of the historical and cultural heritage exposed to the elements and subjected to inclement weather. The use of polymers notably disturbs the transparency and non-gloss characteristics of the surfaces where they are applied. For example, the composite material formed by graphene oxide and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) provides anticorrosive properties, improves mechanical properties, thermal conductivity, and resistance to erosion to the surfaces on which it is applied [Tang J, Yao W, Li W, Xu J, Jin L, JZhang J, Xu Z (2018) Study on a novel composite coating based on PDMS doped with modified graphene oxide. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 15, 375-383], but it supposes an enormous physical change in coloration, gloss and touch of the surface on which it is applied.
    [0020] Therefore, it is necessary to develop new procedures for the protection of assets of interest to the historical and cultural heritage, exposed to the elements.
    [0022] DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
    [0024] The present invention relates to a method of protecting an object or an ornamental surface of rocky origin, exposed to the elements. The object of the present invention is to protect by forming a protective coating comprising graphene oxide, specifically a colloidal dispersion comprising graphene oxide, by spraying it onto said object or surface.
    [0026] The application of colloidal dispersion based on graphene oxide on the ornamental object or surface, for example on the ornamental rock or stone of interest for the historical and cultural heritage provides the whole:
    [0027] • protection against erosion; less surface wear after adverse environmental conditions
    [0028] • waterproofing properties to increase the resistance of the ornamental rock of interest against dissolution processes
    [0029] • biocidal activity that prevents the colonization of living beings under all types of environmental conditions such as thermal, physical and humidity changes • integrity of the property for the historical and cultural heritage; the colloidal dispersion obtained in step (e) maintains the aesthetic and functional integrity of the ornamental good of interest for the historical and cultural heritage.
    [0030] • higher mechanical resistance of the protected rocks, determined by compression tests with a hydraulic press.
    [0031] • negligible color change (not detectable with a commercial painter's colorimeter called “procolor finder mini”) up to a superficial product coverage equal to 0.013 mg / cm2, and barely perceptible under slightly higher conditions, however finding significant differences in the increase of rock strengths already from coverage of at least 0.0066 mg / cm2.
    [0033] Therefore, in a first aspect, the present invention refers to a method for protecting an object or an ornamental surface of rocky origin, exposed to the elements (hereinafter "the method of the present invention"), characterized by comprising the following stages:
    [0034] a) synthesize graphene oxide chemically in an acid medium,
    [0035] b) dispersing the graphene oxide paste obtained in step (a) in water, c) neutralizing the graphene oxide dispersion obtained in step (b) to a pH of between 4.5 and 5.5 by dialysis in Water,
    [0036] d) elimination of the water contained in the graphene oxide obtained in step (c),
    [0037] e) preparing a colloidal dispersion of graphene oxide in a concentration of 0.1 to 1 mg / ml from the graphene oxide obtained in step (d) and water, preferably deionized, and
    [0038] f) Spraying the dispersion obtained in step (e) on the ornamental good of interest, keeping the percentage of obscuration at values less than 1.
    [0040] In the present invention, "of rocky origin" is understood as that object or sedimentary surface such as limestone, dolomite, flint and / or gypsum.
    [0042] In a preferred embodiment of the method of the present invention, the object or surface of rocky origin exposed to the elements is of interest to the historical and cultural heritage.
    [0044] In the present invention, an object or surface of rocky origin of interest for the historical and cultural heritage is understood as that ornamental asset of past, present or future interest, for the historical and cultural heritage, of rocky origin that is found in the open as they are a restoration rock or stone surface, ornamental stone quarries, facades, sculptures and reliefs. In the present invention, an ornamental asset of the historical and cultural heritage is also understood as urban furniture of past present and future interest of rocky origin and exposed to the elements, such as a fountain, a bench to sit on, etc.
    [0046] In the first stage of the procedure, graphene oxide is synthesized chemically in an acid medium, preferably it is synthesized by the Hummers and Offeman method; commonly known as the Hummers method (Hummers, WS, Offeman, RE Preparation of graphitic oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 80, 1339 (1958), 13). This method was described in the 1950s as a chemical way to achieve full oxidation of graphite in a more affordable and safe way than is known to date. In essence, it is based on putting graphite in contact with sulfuric acid and potassium permanganate at controlled times and temperatures. There are innumerable modifications of the Hummers method, in which the inclusion or exclusion of reagents, different proportions between them, different times, temperatures, etc. have been tested. in order to improve the performance and give different chemical natures to the synthesized nanomaterials. Preferably, the method used is that of the following reference Tour et al. del 2010 (Marcano, DC, Kosynkin, DV, Berlin, JM, Sinitskii, A., Sun, Z., Slesarev, A., Alemany, LB, Lu, W., Tour, JM Improved Synthesis of Graphene Oxide. ACS Nano , 4, 4806-4814 (2010)). . According to these authors, the addition of a small part of a polyprotic acid such as phosphoric (for example 10% phosphoric acid) protects the diols formed by permanganate and induces oxidation in consecutive carbons known as the "epoxide line", making the oxidation of the graphite more defined and controllable. In any case, it is imperative to work in a highly acidic medium, generally sulfuric acid; in addition, in most methods they incorporate additional acids such as nitric acid. It should be noted that one of the usual steps of the method, in addition, consists of washing with hydrochloric acid. For this reason, the resulting graphene oxide always has an extremely acidic nature, due to the traces of all the acids used and the presence of numerous highly oxidized carbon fragments adsorbed on the surface of the synthesized material (in English “oxidized carbon debris') .
    [0048] For this reason, the application of any graphene derivative obtained by the Hummers method on rocky material can be highly counterproductive, since calcium and magnesium carbonates are highly reactive to acids and soluble in them.
    [0050] Therefore, to avoid the destruction of the object or ornamental surface of interest, of rocky origin, the process of the present invention comprises steps (b) and (c) to remove as much acid as possible. Step (b) tries to disperse the graphene oxide paste obtained in step (a) in water, preferably deionized water; and step (c) neutralizing the graphene oxide dispersion obtained in step (b) to a pH <5 by dialysis in water, preferably ultrapure water.
    [0052] Traditionally, neutralization is carried out by adding alkalis, but said alkalis can remain indefinitely in the graphene oxide and also be detrimental in subsequent applications on the ornamental rock of carbonate origin of interest.
    [0054] Possible processes to neutralize the graphene oxide obtained by means of the Hummers method are the dispersion-filtering and dispersion-centrifugation processes in water, but they are very laborious processes and involve the use of long periods of suction and ultrasound that can damage and / or compact the material. In this sense, dialysis in water has an advantage; it would be a simpler and less harmful process to meet the objective of neutralizing the graphene oxide obtained in step (b).
    [0056] A factor to take into account in the dialysis of step (c) of the process of the present invention is the choice of membranes. Due to the extremely acidic conditions of newly synthesized graphene oxide, the membrane material must have a viable chemical composition under these conditions, as well as have a pore size large enough to allow free passage of water but at the same time. time small enough to prevent graphene oxide from inside the membrane. The dialysis membranes used in the dialysis of step (c) are preferably of molecular weight cutoff between 6 kDa and 8 kDa; even more preferably they are made of regenerated cellulose. This specific type of membrane meets the required requirements, and furthermore, its cellulose-based composition is ideal for dialysis in water given its high hydrophilicity. Likewise, cellulose is a renewable and biodegradable material, so it also has secondary advantages in sustainability and affordability of the process.
    [0058] The process of the present invention continues with step (d) eliminating the water contained in the graphene oxide obtained in step (c). Said step can be carried out with any technique known to the person skilled in the art. Preferably step (d) is carried out by slow evaporation or by lyophilization.
    [0060] Step (e) of the process of the present invention refers to the preparation of a graphene oxide colloidal dispersion in a concentration of 0.1 to 1 mg / ml from the graphene oxide obtained in step (d) and water, preferably deionized water.
    [0062] The last stage of the procedure, stage (f) refers to the spraying of the dispersion obtained in stage (e) on the ornamental rock of interest, keeping the percentage of obscuration at values between 0 and 0.7. That is, we have determined an index to determine the darkening by detecting the absorbance of the treated sample compared to the untreated sample. We have determined the absorbance by means of a Diffuse Reflectance Device to be coupled to a UV-Vis spectrophotometer, with a Barium Sulfate standard. The absorbance of the clear limestone samples was determined, extracting from the spectrum the wavelengths of the visible spectrum most similar to the color of the sample (between yellow and orange), so we have stayed in a spectrum between 570 nm and 690 nm. Therefore, we define the "percentage of relative obscuration or obscuration rate" as that value obtained from the following equation:
    [0064] Darkening rate
    [0065] Absorb 'sample without GO - Absorbance -sample coated with n layers GO Absorbance sample without GO
    [0066] The spray can partially or completely cover the ornamental good of interest.
    [0068] It should be noted here that a darkening of 1 would mean twice the tone of the sample, which in this case, being white samples, means a barely perceptible darkening, and yet it has not been achieved even in samples with 4 layers . When it is intended to completely cover the object or the ornamental surface with the colloidal graphene oxide dispersion obtained in step (e), the percentage of obscuration must be less than 1 so that the color change is negligible, that is, the color change may not be detectable with a commercial colorimeter such as a procolor mini finder commonly used by painters.
    [0070] When it is intended to partially cover the ornamental object or surface, the allowed darkening rate will depend on the ornamental asset as a whole, since what is intended to be avoided is that a difference in brightness, color or tone of the treated rock can be visually appreciated. to those who are not. An application of 2 or 3 layers does not cause darkening, while an application greater in number of layers could lead to a change. Therefore, it is also important to bear in mind that, since it is natural stone, which has different shades, those darker samples will allow the dose of graphene oxide layers to be increased more than those lighter parts.
    [0072] Throughout the description and claims the word "comprise" and its variants are not intended to exclude other technical characteristics, additives, components or steps. For those skilled in the art, other objects, advantages and characteristics of the invention will emerge partly from the description and partly from the practice of the invention. The following examples and figures are provided by way of illustration, and are not intended to be limiting of the present invention.
    [0074] BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
    [0076] FIG. 1 Electron microscopy images of synthesized graphene oxide. Image (a) corresponds to a scanning electron microscope image (scale bar = 10 pm), while images (b) and (c) correspond to microscopy transmission electronics (scale bars = 1 ^ m (b), 0.2 ^ m (c)).
    [0078] FIG. 2 . Chemical characterization of the synthesized graphene oxide. (a) Thermal degradation profile (b) Infrared spectrum.
    [0080] FIG. 3. Photogrammetric analysis of the sample protected with graphene oxide AG10. (a) Before exposure, (b) After exposure, and (c) Actual changes
    [0082] FIG. 4 . Photogrammetric analysis of the sample not protected with graphene oxide A10. (A) Before exposure, (b) After exposure and (c) Real changes.
    [0084] FIG. 5. Results of mechanical resistance in Mpa in the hydraulic press of the samples with graphene oxide (AG, RG and NG) and the unprotected samples (A, R and N).
    [0086] FIG. 6 . Photograph taken with a magnifying glass of 10x magnification of the sample MA3 before and after being subjected to a test with rain and thermal changes. (a) Before (b) After
    [0088] FIG. 7 . Photographs taken with a 10x magnification of the MN1 sample before and after being subjected to a test with rain and thermal changes. (a) Before (b) After
    [0090] FIG. 8 . Photograph taken with a magnifying glass of 5x magnification of the MAG2 sample before and after being subjected to a test in the rain. (a) Before (b) After
    [0092] FIG. 9. Photograph taken with a 5x magnification of the MNG1 sample before and after being subjected to a test with rain and thermal changes. (a) Before (b) After
    [0094] FIG. 10. XPS spectra of the C1s orbitals in three representative samples.
    [0096] FIG. 11. Range of shades covered by the samples. RAL Classic code measured with a Nix Mini “procolor finder mini” colorimeter, manufactured by Nix Sensor Ltd. Serial No. D5085200.
    [0098] FIG. 12. Average spectra of diffuse reflectance in UV-Vis collected in a specific range of wavelengths for the samples not coated and coated with 1, 2, 3 and 4 layers of graphene oxide. Likewise, BaSO4 is included as a reference (negative control).
    [0100] EXAMPLE
    [0102] The invention will now be illustrated by means of tests carried out by the inventors, which show the effectiveness of the product of the invention.
    [0104] Example 1.
    [0106] Synthesis of Graphene Oxide.
    [0107] The synthesis of graphene oxide following the phosphoric acid modified Hummers method according to Tour, J. M. Improved Synthesis of Graphene Oxide. ACS Nano, 4, 4806 4814 (2010)] followed by a dialysis step in water.
    [0109] 3 g of flake graphite was contacted with 400 mL of a mixture of sulfuric and phosphoric acids in a 9: 1 volumetric ratio, in a round bottom glass flask with constant stirring and external cooling with an ice bath. Then 18 g of potassium permanganate was added little by little. Once all the potassium permanganate was added, following continuous stirring, it was heated to 50 ° C and allowed to react overnight (approximately 16 h). Subsequently, the reaction mixture was poured on a metal mesh to screen and remove the thicker solid particles, assisting the process with a vacuum pump. The sieved mixture is poured over ~ 400 g of ice (made with clean, deionized water) and 3 mL of 50% hydrogen peroxide was added to the whole. Once the ice had melted, the entire resulting volume was subjected to centrifugation (4000 rcf) for 1 hour, discarding the supernatant liquid. Subsequently, the resulting paste was dissolved in 200-300 mL of commercial concentrated hydrochloric acid and centrifuged, again discarding the supernatants. Finally, the same process was repeated once more, but this time dispersing the resulting paste in commercial 96% ethanol.
    [0111] Subsequently, the paste resulting from the last centrifugation in ethanol was dispersed in deionized water (an amount between 500 mL and 1000 mL) and the entire volume of The solution was inserted into dialysis membranes, made of regenerated cellulose (SpectraPor®, molecular weight cutoff 6-8 kDa). In turn, the membranes were inserted into a container large enough to be immersed in at least 5-10 times its volume of ultrapure water, under constant stirring. The water was changed every 2 hours until the acidic pH in the dialysis waters was no longer observed, measured by indicator paper, and the dispersion of graphene oxide within the dialysis membrane exhibited a pH around 5, in a range between 4.5 and 5.5. To recover the solid graphene oxide from the water where it has been dissolved in the dialysis, said water was evaporated by gentle heating to 40 ° C. Optionally, it can also be lyophilized (freezing and sublimation of the ice formed by high vacuum). Finally, between 3 and 6 grams of graphene oxide are obtained.
    [0113] Figure 1 shows different images of the synthesized graphene oxide obtained by scanning electron microscopy and by transmission electron microscopy.
    [0115] Figure 2 (a) shows the thermal degradation profile of graphene oxide, which shows a first loss (over 100 ° C) corresponding to humidity and a low proportion in the sample (7% weight). Subsequently, it experiences a significant weight loss centered at 200 ° C, which would correspond to the thermolabile oxygenated groups that it has on the surface (around 35-40% weight). In Figure 2 (b) its infrared spectrum is presented. This technique identifies the chemical nature of the functional groups that graphene oxide possesses. A large presence of -OH groups (for the band at 3396 cm-1), of linear and cyclic esters (for both bands at 1737.6 cm-1 and 1625.7 cm-1 respectively), and also a high presence of epoxide groups (through the band at 1228.5 cm-1).
    [0117] Obtaining graphene oxide colloidal dispersion
    [0118] Powdered graphene oxide was introduced into an Erlenmeyer flask and deionized water was added to obtain a final concentration of 0.5 mg / mL. It was gently shaken in circles, alternating with short pulses, of no more than 10 seconds, of ultrasound in an ultrasound bath (45 kHz). The process was suspended once complete homogeneity was observed and the absence of large solid particles suspended or deposited on the bottom. Under these conditions, graphene oxide can hold perfectly in suspension for up to 8 hours before starting to precipitate to the bottom of the container that contains it [León, V., González-Domínguez, JM, Fierro, JLG, Prato, M., Vázquez, E. Production and stability of mechanochemically exfoliated graphene in water and culture media. Nanoscale, 8, 14548-14555 (2016)]. To recover the dispersion, manual agitation combined with ultrasound pulses can easily be applied.
    [0120] Cathedral stone application
    [0121] Below is a scheme 1 of the tests carried out during the first phase to determine the effectiveness and behavior of graphene oxide as a protector.
    [0123] Scheme 1 of samples analyzed to determine the effectiveness and behavior of graphene oxide as a protector.
    [0125] SAMPLE
    [0127] 3 rain (NG)
    [0128]
    [0129] s with (4 passes 0.5 mg / ml) 3 rainfall and changes Assay
    [0130] 20 * 10 * 30 cm3) 3 rain (N)
    [0131] 9 uncoated 3 thermal changes tests (R) resistance 3 rain and changes
    [0132]
    [0133] Dolomites and
    [0134] Limestone 2 rain (MNG) Observation extracted from the 6 with 5x oxide and the same graphene quarry 2 magnifying glass changes to lx, Stone from the 15 samples (4 passes OS mg / ml) - thermal (MRG) -lOx
    [0135] 2 rain and changes
    [0136] Cathedral of León medium (M) thermal Color (Irregular and 12 * 9 uncoated (MAG) using
    [0138] 12 samples Small Raman spectroscopy (m) All with oxide X-ray Diffraction (XRD) (Irregular 2 * 3 * 0.5 cm3) graphene (mG)
    [0139] (4 passes 0.5 mg / ml) Emitted Photoelectron Spectroscopy
    [0140]
    [0142] As observed in said scheme, a total of 45 samples of irregular shapes were obtained from the same cathedral stone (dolomite), classified according to size in 18 large samples, 15 medium samples and 12 small samples with lower sides. to 2-3 cm. The samples of these three size groups were subdivided in turn into 2 similar subgroups, where by luck it would be divided which subgroup would be control and which would be experimental. Half of these were treated with the graphene oxide product (GO) at a concentration of 0.5 mg / mL obtained as described above by means of an airbrush, applying 4 layers on one of the groups into which each was divided. size group. This half of the collected samples formed the experimental group, leaving the rest of the samples without any coating as control samples.
    [0144] The 18 large samples were photographed in detail to apply photogrammetric techniques and evaluate the wear found between the experimental and control samples. The photogrammetry used has been Structure from Motion (SfM), which allows to reconstruct an exact 3D model of each rock sampled from images. Therefore, this methodology requires taking photographs of all areas of the object's surface with overlapping areas (coincidences). These photographs must be taken from at least two different positions. From then on, common elements of each of the photographs will be identified which, together with the information on the position and orientation of the camera, will make it possible to determine the 3D coordinates from the 2D coordinates [James, MR, & Robson, S. ( 2014). Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground based image networks. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 39 (10), 1413-1420]. 3D models are subsequently obtained from a point cloud thanks to software such as Agisoft Photoscan based on SfM (Structure from Motion) technology. Thus, the models prior to exposure to physical agents and the models of the rocks when they have already suffered the effect of these agents can be subtracted later, to detect the wear that has occurred or the protection in the case of samples with graphene oxide.
    [0146] After modeling all the large samples, they were divided into 3 batches, each batch consisting of an equal number of experimental and control samples. These batches were subjected to the simulation of the main climatic aggressions: a batch with intense rain (N), another with extreme thermal changes from -18 ° C to 35 ° C (R) and the last batch with synergy of both processes, is say with heavy rain and extreme thermal changes (A). Afterwards, the photogrammetric studies were carried out to evaluate their losses. In all the analyzed samples we found similar results, although the difference was greater when it came to samples that had been exposed to rain.
    [0147] FIGS. 3 and 4 show the photogrammetric analysis of the sample protected with graphene oxide AG10 (Fig 3) and the sample A10 not protected (Fig 4). In them it is observed that, after having been subjected to rain processes and thermal changes, in the protected rock AG10 a superficial wear is not appreciated that is sufficiently noticeable to record it (Fig 3), while in the unprotected A10 erosion it is quite prominent (Fig 4).
    [0149] These large samples were then subjected to pressure in a hydraulic press and with a Smith hammer to evaluate the resistance offered by the treated stones. Preliminarily, it was found that the samples protected with graphene oxide (AG, RG and NG) offered greater resistance than the unprotected ones (A, R and N) regardless of the treatment undergone, although the difference was greater in the samples subjected to rain (AG, NG, A and N) (Fig 5).
    [0151] The samples from the batch of medium stones (15) were divided as follows: 6 with 4 layers of graphene oxide (MNG, MRG and MAG) and 9 as control samples (MN, MR and MA). Thus, each erosion group (N, R and A) had two graphene-coated stones (2 MNG, 2 MRG and 2 MAG) and three without it (3 MN, 3 MR and 3 MA). The changes in these samples were observed by viewing with a magnifying glass. An attempt was also made to use these samples to determine the stability of graphene oxide in the stone after undergoing the entire process involved in cycles of extreme weather conditions.
    [0153] In the examination of the medium-sized samples (M) through the magnifying glass, it was observed that the smaller granules are entrained, preferably in the samples without graphene oxide, and a smoothing of the surface occurs together with an increase in porosity in unprotected samples, probably due to limestone dissolution processes.
    [0155] The photographs shown in figure 6 correspond to the sample MA3, without graphene, before and after being subjected to the mixed treatment (A). You can see how the profiles of the orange cavity have been eroded, as well as the surface that surrounds it. The images are made with 10x magnification. This kind of wear The surface area develops constantly over time and ends up deforming limestone like that of sculptures that are exposed to the open air, rain and thermal changes.
    [0157] In Figure 7 the photographs taken with a magnifying glass of 10x magnification of the MN1 sample before and after being subjected to a test example with more rain and thermal changes. It can be easily seen in the photographs with 10x magnification how the surface tends to homogenize. The area after experimentation is smoother and presents less irregularities than before (Fig. 7).
    [0159] However, in the samples protected with graphene oxide (MG) it can be seen how it maintains practically the same profile (Fig. 8), unlike the stones without graphene where it had rounded. The photogrammetry tests showed a substantial improvement in general, while with these, the improvement also occurs in the smallest profiles.
    [0161] The following images correspond to MNG1. Before the rain tests, the limestone had marked black spots due to colonization of an undetermined lichen. After experimentation, the spots decreased in intensity and presence (Fig. 9).
    [0163] Comparison of the treated and untreated rock samples that underwent rain simulation (MN) show how the uncoated ones have been completely colonized by moss and lichens, while the antimicrobial power of graphene oxide has prevented the colonization of the rocks. protected (MNG). Small spots were observed in a very local way and little present, which, when observed by microscope, were characterized as moss and dead lichens by the expert Professor of Botany Doctor Arsenio Terrón (University of León). The exploration of lichens on the surface found in the uncoated samples (MN) the presence of mainly thalluses of Verrucaria sp. This lichen secretes substances that over time deteriorate the surface of the stone. In some we even find structures of sexual reproduction, which means that the lichen is alive and proliferating. However, in the samples protected with graphene oxide (MNG) we found traces of lichen Lecidea sp and Verrucaria sp present in scattered and barely active thalli. It should be noted that these lichens were already present in the rock before applying the coating and has not grown afterwards. They even seem to retract slightly, so we see how the treatment is effective.
    [0165] The tests carried out on large and medium-sized samples confirmed the usefulness of protection in the studied samples, and therefore suggested studying what is the minimum concentration that allows the stone the protection effect and its durability over time. The optimal concentration was studied in the subsequent testing phase. To check the durability over time and the resistance of graphene oxide on the samples after being subjected to rainfall and thermal changes, the small samples (mG) were used. It was extremely difficult to find a technique sensitive enough to be able to observe the state of stability of the graphene oxide layer on these samples (mNG). The measurement by Raman spectroscopy was ruled out due to the high fluorescence of the limestone, and the X-ray Diffraction technique was also ruled out because it was not very sensitive. The technique finally chosen for this purpose was the X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) that allows us to know the chemical state and the surface electronic structure of the samples. This XPS analysis suggested that the protective layer of graphene oxide remains constant on the treated stones despite the aggression of the rain and the thermal changes subjected.
    [0167] A selection of 6 small samples (m) were analyzed. With this technique, we were able to collect in a table the binding energies of the most abundant elements in each sample and in another the atomic relationships of the elements in the surface region (approximately 3-4 nm deep). Dolomite was confirmed to be a double carbonate of Mg and Ca but contains aluminosilicate impurities (Table 1 and 2).
    [0169] In order to see if the graphene oxide that was used to coat the surface of the dolomite grains, the C1s orbital level of fresh dolomite (mN, mR and mA) and dolomite with GO (mNG, mRG and mAG) taking as reference the C1s of graphene oxide.
    [0171] Table 1. Ligation energies (eV) of internal levels of dolomite and graphene oxide samples
    [0172]
    [0175] The percentage of the C1s peak of the carbonate species is in parentheses. Dolomite contains, in addition to Mg and Ca carbonate, aluminosilicate.
    [0177] Table 2. Atomic composition (% atoms) of dolomite samples
    [0179]
    [0182] Figure 12 shows the XPS spectra of the C1s orbitals in three representative samples. It is observed how the signal of the carbonates (shading) decreases appreciably in the samples coated with graphene oxide (mNG, mRG and mAG), so this technique can constitute a routine test to verify the presence of graphene oxide in the surface of the samples.
    [0184] In addition to recording the C1s orbitals of the three samples, their comparison of the XPS spectra was also carried out (See Table 1). It is clearly seen that the Carbonate (shaded) strongly decreases in dolomite coated with graphene oxide (mNG, mRG, and mAG) (Figure 10). This indicates that graphene oxide has coated the surface of the dolomite grains. The atomic ratios of the elements under graphene oxide are approximately the same as fresh dolomite (mN, mR and mA), which also supports that graphene oxide is coating the dolomite substrate.
    [0186] Scheme 2 of the samples analyzed during the second phase of the work is presented below to determine the minimum and maximum number of layers of graphene oxide recommended to be used on the rock, which effectively protects but falls within the tolerable limits as far as possible. regarding modification of aesthetics and color.
    [0188] SAMPLE
    [0190] 3 without oxide from 1 Tests with graphene (X) Photogravimetry 3 with 1 oxide layer
    [0191] graphene (GX) 2 Observation
    [0192] x 5 x 5 cm 3) 4 with 3 commercial layers (each layer 0.0033mg / cm2 graphene oxide 3 (GXXX) tests
    [0193] Limestone . (GXXXX)
    [0194] drawn from the 7 without rust
    [0195] same graphene quarry (mX) Reflecta nci a Piedra de la 16 rain y 'diffuse Catedral de León 3 with 1 oxide layer thermal changes
    [0196] graphene (mGX)
    [0197] • 1 of 2 layers
    [0198]
    [0199] graphene (mGXX)
    [0200] 19 samples 3 with 3 oxide layers Small (m) graphene spectroscopy (mGXXX)
    [0203] 19 fragments or small samples (with dimensions less than 2 cm on one side) named (mX, mGX, mGXX, mGXXX and mGXXXX) were collected. Due to their size, these small samples are ideal for physicochemical analysis, as in the case of XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) or analysis of its absorbance. In addition, experiments have been carried out with another 18 prismatic samples of 8x5x5cm3, making batches of rocks, three with 0 layers (mX), three with 1 layer (GX), four with 2 layers (GXX), four with 3 layers (GXXX) and four with 4 layers of graphene oxide (GXXXX).
    [0205] In all cases there would be an insignificant variation in color (measured with a commercial paint colorimeter). The samples already naturally present a small color variation, whose range of variation is between the tones in Figure 11. For the most part, the samples had the tone considered as 1015 according to the range of tones covered by the samples. RAL Classic code measured with a colorimeter type Nix Mini Procolor finder mini, manufactured by Nix Sensor Ltd. Serial No. D5085200. After the application of graphene oxide and the erosion tests to which they were subjected, it can be clearly seen that the samples maintain their initial color; stones with 1 (GX) and 2 layers (GXX) have no obvious changes to the naked eye, remaining in the initial color of 1015 or 1014. However, the samples that have 3 (GXXX) and 4 layers (GXXXX) do have darkened slightly, although hardly noticeable, going from having a hue of 1015 or 1013 to 1014. These 4 tones are attached because they correspond to the range of natural colors found in the samples, so that it can be seen that the same natural stone already presents changes more important than what the graphene coverage of the maximum number of applied layers implies (4).
    [0207] It was found that just 2 coats is sufficient for acceptable protection, increasing protection to 4 coats. Each of the layers that is applied has a concentration of 0.0033mg / cm2 considering a concentration of the initial colloidal dispersion of 0.5mg / mL.
    [0209] Lastly, the degree of opacity has been evaluated using diffuse reflectance techniques in the visible in discontinuous mode, taken with the Diffuse Reflectance Device coupled to a UV-Vis spectrophotometer, and it has been observed that there are hardly any differences between the samples with the white, i.e. samples without graphene oxide (Fig 12).
    [0211] In order to estimate the relative obscuration observed in the samples treated with graphene oxide (GO), a rate has been applied according to the following equation:
    [0213] Absorbance -sample without GO - Absorbance -sample coated with n layers GO darkening rate =
    [0214] Sample absorbance without GO
    [0216] Applying this equation, it has been verified that treating the samples with up to 4 layers of graphene oxide hardly causes darkening when said layer has a concentration of 0.0033 mg / cm2 (for an initial colloidal dispersion of 0.5 mg / mL). Taking into account the lightness of the color of the graphene stone, the treatment has only meant increasing its absorbance values and only with 3 and 4 layers it would be observable, although without assuming a striking darkening; in no case does the stone darken even to twice a color that is already very light in itself. In order to be able to compare the spectra, points of the visible spectrum of colors similar to the hue of the rocks have been chosen, between yellow and orange (600 nm, 610 nm and 620 nm) (See Table 3).
    [0218] Table 3. Average measurements of the absorbance slopes. The absorbance values at 600 nm, 610 nm and 620 nm and relative darkening with respect to the color of the untreated sample are also shown.
    [0220]
    权利要求:
    Claims (7)
    [1]
    1. A procedure for the protection of an object or an ornamental surface of rocky origin, exposed to the elements, characterized in that it comprises the following steps:
    a) synthesize graphene oxide chemically in an acid medium
    b) dispersing the graphene oxide paste obtained in step (a) in water,
    c) neutralizing the graphene oxide dispersion obtained in step (b) to a pH of between 4.5 and 5.5 by dialysis in water
    d) eliminating the water contained in the graphene oxide obtained in step (c),
    e) preparing a colloidal dispersion of graphene oxide in a concentration between 0.1 and 1 mg / ml from the graphene oxide obtained in step (d) and water, and
    f) spraying the dispersion obtained in step (e) on the good of interest, keeping the percentage of obscuration at values less than 1.
    [2]
    2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the ornamental object or surface of rocky origin is of interest to the historical and cultural heritage.
    [3]
    3. The process according to any of claims 1 or 2, wherein the dialysis of step (c) is carried out with membranes with a molecular weight cutoff between 6 kDa and 8 kDa cellulose.
    [4]
    4. The process according to claim 3, wherein the dialysis of step (c) is carried out with regenerated cellulose membranes.
    [5]
    5. The process according to any of claims 1 to 4, wherein step (d) is carried out by evaporation or lyophilization.
    [6]
    6. The process according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the graphene oxide colloidal dispersion of step (e) is prepared in a concentration between 0.1 and 1 mg / ml.
    [7]
    7. The method according to any of claims 1 to 6, wherein the percentage of darkening of step (f) has to be kept at values between 0 and 0.7.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    Licchelli et al.2014|Nanoparticles for conservation of bio-calcarenite stone
    Afsharpour et al.2017|Preventive protection of paper works by using nanocomposite coating of zinc oxide
    Carretti et al.2013|Interactions between nanostructured calcium hydroxide and acrylate copolymers: implications in cultural heritage conservation
    Abdel-Maksoud et al.2011|Effect of burial environment on crocodile bones from Hawara excavation, Fayoum, Egypt
    Neiman et al.2015|Cinnabar alteration in archaeological wall paintings: an experimental and theoretical approach
    Aldosari et al.2019|Using ZnO nanoparticles in fungal inhibition and self-protection of exposed marble columns in historic sites
    Hethke et al.2013|Seasonal to sub-seasonal palaeoenvironmental changes in Lake Sihetun |
    Eyssautier-Chuine et al.2014|Assessment of new protective treatments for porous limestone combining water-repellency and anti-colonization properties
    Doménech-Carbó et al.2012|Characterization of prehispanic cosmetics found in a burial of the ancient city of Teotihuacan |
    Makarona et al.2017|Enhancing wood resistance to humidity with nanostructured ZnO coatings
    Renda et al.2020|Assessment of protection treatments for carbonatic stone using nanocomposite coatings
    ES2784876B2|2021-05-26|Procedure for the protection of an object or an ornamental surface of rocky origin, exposed to the elements.
    Romanens et al.2019|Soil diversity and major soil processes in the Kalahari basin, Botswana
    Yang et al.2014|Artificial hydroxyapatite film for the conservation of outdoor marble artworks
    Becerra et al.2019|Nanolimes doped with quantum dots for stone consolidation assessment
    Toniolo et al.2018|The protection of marble surfaces: The challenge to develop suitable nanostructured treatments
    Baglioni et al.2021|How science can contribute to the remedial conservation of cultural heritage
    Sassoni et al.2020|Nanolime, nanosilica or ammonium phosphate? Laboratory and field study on consolidation of a byzantine marble sarcophagus
    Aldosari et al.2019|Evaluation of preventive performance of kaolin and calcium hydroxide nanocomposites in strengthening the outdoor carved limestone
    Abdel-Maksoud et al.2018|Evaluation of some pastes used for gap filling of archaeological bones
    Churchman2013|The key role of micromorphology in studies of the genesis of clay minerals and their associations in soils and its relevance to advances in the philosophy of soil science
    ABD EL-TAWAB BADER et al.2016|THE CLEANING OF THE ISIS TEMPLE'S MURAL PAINTINGS IN UPPER EGYPT USING ZINC OXIDE NANOPARTICLES AND NON-IONIC DETERGENT.
    Sassoni et al.2020|Comparative study between ammonium phosphate and ethyl silicate towards conservation of prehistoric paintings in the magura cave |
    Edwards et al.2002|Raman spectroscopic study of lichen‐assisted weathering of sandstone outcrops in the High Atlas Mountains, Morocco
    Kramar et al.2011|Deterioration of the black Drenov Grič limestone on historical monuments |
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    ES2784876B2|2021-05-26|
    EP3950801A1|2022-02-09|
    WO2020193827A1|2020-10-01|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    CN107324365A|2017-07-27|2017-11-07|西北工业大学|A kind of nanometer barium hydroxide/graphene nanocomposite material and preparation method|
    CN106317976A|2016-09-08|2017-01-11|上海理工大学|Preparation method of graphene/titanium dioxide transparent anticorrosive coating|
    CN106866074A|2017-02-28|2017-06-20|惠州市博罗至诚化工有限公司|A kind of high temperature resistant high-hardness water-proof wall covering and preparation method thereof|
    法律状态:
    2020-10-01| BA2A| Patent application published|Ref document number: 2784876 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: A1 Effective date: 20201001 |
    2021-05-26| FG2A| Definitive protection|Ref document number: 2784876 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: B2 Effective date: 20210526 |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    ES201930277A|ES2784876B2|2019-03-26|2019-03-26|Procedure for the protection of an object or an ornamental surface of rocky origin, exposed to the elements.|ES201930277A| ES2784876B2|2019-03-26|2019-03-26|Procedure for the protection of an object or an ornamental surface of rocky origin, exposed to the elements.|
    PCT/ES2020/070177| WO2020193827A1|2019-03-26|2020-03-13|Method for protecting an ornamental object or surface of rocky origin, exposed to the elements|
    EP20778794.6A| EP3950801A1|2019-03-26|2020-03-13|Method for protecting an ornamental object or surface of rocky origin, exposed to the elements|
    [返回顶部]